I don't know what to think about this case.
The slant of the majority of the American press is, "poor innocent Amanda is being railroaded by overzealous prosecutor."
The majority of the British press is the exact opposite, "Amanda is a lying psychopath who doesn't seem upset about her brutally murdered roommate."
I read Meredith's injuries were caused by more than one person. But Amanda's lawyers and PR team (yes her parents hired one), say the DNA/evidence was tainted.
Her ex boyfriend said they weren't together. Why wouldn't their alibis be the same?
I hope the jury focuses on the facts and finds justice for Meredith. I don't envy them.